Skip to main content
COVID-19 information and screening Learn how we’re keeping our campus community safe, healthy and engaged during our gradual return to campus.
Note: The university’s mandatory vaccine directive is now in effect. Learn more about vaccine requirements.
Ontario Tech acknowledges the lands and people of the Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation.

We are thankful to be welcome on these lands in friendship. The lands we are situated on are covered by the Williams Treaties and are the traditional territory of the Mississaugas, a branch of the greater Anishinaabeg Nation, including Algonquin, Ojibway, Odawa and Pottawatomi. These lands remain home to many Indigenous nations and peoples.

We acknowledge this land out of respect for the Indigenous nations who have cared for Turtle Island, also called North America, from before the arrival of settler peoples until this day. Most importantly, we acknowledge that the history of these lands has been tainted by poor treatment and a lack of friendship with the First Nations who call them home.

This history is something we are all affected by because we are all treaty people in Canada. We all have a shared history to reflect on, and each of us is affected by this history in different ways. Our past defines our present, but if we move forward as friends and allies, then it does not have to define our future.

Learn more about Indigenous Education and Cultural Services

University of Ontario Institute of Technology logo

Professional Unsuitability Procedures (Undergraduate)

Classification number ACD 1513.01
Parent policy Professional Suitability Policy (Undergraduate)
Framework category Academic
Approving authority Undergraduate Studies Committee
Policy owner Registrar
Approval date June 15, 2021
Review date June 2024
Supersedes Academic Misconduct and Professional Unsuitability Procedures May 15, 2018; Academic Regulations – Undergraduate Academic Calendar 2016-2017

Purpose

The purpose of these Procedures is to outline the process for launching and resolving undergraduate-related professional unsuitability allegations.

Definitions

This section is intentionally left blank.

Scope and authority

These Procedures apply to the launching of undergraduate-related professional unsuitability allegations and their subsequent resolution.
These Procedures do not apply to the launching of graduate-related professional unsuitability allegations. For more information regarding graduate-related and professional unsuitability, please refer to the Graduate Academic Calendar.
The Registrar, or successor thereof, is the Policy Owner and is responsible for overseeing the implementation, administration and interpretation of these Procedures.

Procedures

Launching of professional unsuitability allegations
  1. Alleged acts of professional unsuitability should be reported to the dean or dean’s designate of the faculty in which the student is enrolled.

Dealing with professional unsuitability

  1. All allegations of professional unsuitability must be addressed by the student’s home dean or dean’s designate.
  2. A student will not be permitted to withdraw from the course in which the offence was alleged to have been committed until the matter is resolved and sanction imposed. Once notified of an unresolved complaint relating to professional unsuitability, the dean or dean’s designate shall notify the Office of the Registrar to put the student's account on hold and refer the matter to an academic integrity committee comprised of the dean's designate and two members of the academic staff to investigate the complaint and recommend a resolution.
Procedures for formal resolution
  1. The dean or dean’s designate must inform the student, in writing, of the allegations, the possible sanctions and a copy of the pertinent policy statement. The student will be given five working days to prepare a response. The academic integrity committee will meet with the student to hear the response. The student is entitled to be accompanied by up to two advisors at this meeting, provided 48 hours advance written notice is given of the identity of the advisors.
  2. The academic integrity committee shall conduct an investigation of the allegations and response, and make its recommendation to the dean or dean’s designate within 10 further working days. The dean or dean’s designate will notify the parties and the Office of the Registrar of the decision in writing.

Transcript notations and appeal process

  1. Transcript notations for professional unsuitability will include the following range of notations:
    1. Grade of F assigned for [course number] for academic misconduct;
    2. Suspended for academic misconduct for [dates of suspension];
    3. Suspended for professional unsuitability; and permanently expelled for academic misconduct.
  2. Transcript notations will normally be recorded on the academic transcript for a minimum of two years.
  3. A student may apply to the academic appeals committee to have the notice of suspension and/or transcript notation expunged from his/her academic record after a minimum of two years from the last offence. If the appeal is granted, the Office of the Registrar will be notified to remove the notation.
  4. Transcript notations for students who are suspended for professional unsuitability or permanently expelled for academic misconduct will remain on their academic record and cannot be appealed.

Monitoring and review

These Procedures will be reviewed as necessary and at least every three years. The Registrar, or successor thereof, is responsible to monitor and review these Procedures.

Relevant legislation

This section intentionally left blank

Related policies, procedures & documents

Professional Suitability Policy (Undergraduate)